The Lerxs design treats artificial intelligence as a tool for detecting patterns and generating hypotheses, not as an independent authority that may ignore patient consent.

### Why this is right The white paper states that artificial intelligence outputs must remain traceable to source data, are subject to human review, and cannot act outside platform role constraints or patient consent settings. Those controls make the tool subordinate to governance rules. ### The concept A **pattern detector** identifies relationships or trends in data, while a **hypothesis generator** suggests possibilities for further consideration. Neither role makes a system the final clinical authority. The paper's design philosophy constrains artificial intelligence through explanation, human oversight, permissions, and role limits. ### The other options - **False**: This is incorrect because the statement accurately reflects the stated constraint that artificial intelligence cannot override consent settings or platform rules. ### Terms - **Artificial intelligence (AI)**: Computer methods used to detect patterns or produce recommendations. - **Role constraint**: A rule limiting what a user or system is permitted to do. ### Remember A model may suggest patterns, but consent and human oversight define its boundaries.