Skip to content

A public-facing server has a known vulnerability, but there is no evidence of exploitation or unauthorized activity. What is the most accurate classification based on the course material?

Answer

A vulnerability and risk requiring assessment, but not automatically a confirmed incident

Explanation

### Why this is right A vulnerability is a weakness that could be exploited. Without evidence of exploitation, unauthorized activity, or resulting harm, it is not automatically a confirmed incident. Its exposure and potential impact still require assessment and mitigation. ### The concept Risk depends on more than the existence of a flaw. Analysts consider whether a credible threat can reach it, whether exploitation is active, what assets and data are involved, and what controls limit impact. An internet-facing, business-critical server may deserve urgent attention, but prioritization is a risk decision rather than proof that compromise occurred. ### The other options - **B. A confirmed data breach**: No unauthorized access or disclosure is established. - **C. A completed eradication**: No incident cause has been removed in the scenario. - **D. A post-incident review**: This follows incident handling and evaluates lessons learned. ### Terms - **Vulnerability**: A weakness that may be exploited. - **Risk**: The potential for harm, informed by likelihood and impact. ### Remember A weakness creates exposure; evidence of exploitation or likely harm may trigger incident handling.

Related Questions

Want to practice more questions like this?

Join myBenkio free and practice past questions for your Nigerian university courses with AI explanations for every answer.

Start Practicing Free