Reconstruct Lewis’s inference from the Moral Law to a power behind the universe, and identify one limit he places on that inference.

### Why this is right The inference proceeds from moral experience: people recognize an obligation that cannot be reduced to what they happen to do or prefer. Lewis treats that obligation as evidence of a reality beyond ordinary material facts, while acknowledging that the conclusion is limited. ### The concept Lewis contrasts materialist explanations of the universe with a religious view in which something mind-like lies behind it. The Moral Law is his distinctive evidence because people have first-person access to the experience of obligation. He does not claim that this argument alone proves every Christian doctrine or even a fully personal God. It is an initial step, not the entire case. ### What a good answer covers - The Moral Law is more than behaviour, instinct, or convenience. - Moral obligation is treated as evidence of something beyond material facts. - Lewis’s conclusion is tentative and does not yet establish Christian theology. ### Remember Lewis presents the Moral Law as a clue to a power behind the universe, not as a complete proof of Christianity.