Mere Christianityintermediate
How does Lewis distinguish forgiving an enemy from excusing the enemy’s actions?
Answer
A strong answer should explain that forgiveness means willing the enemy’s good and hoping for the person’s moral healing, not pretending that harmful actions were acceptable. Lewis allows condemnation, punishment, and, in some cases, killing in war, while rejecting hatred and pleasure in revenge.
Explanation
### Why this is right
Lewis separates concern for a person from approval of that person’s conduct. One can hate cruelty, punish wrongdoing, and still wish that the wrongdoer might change and become good.
### The concept
For Lewis, love is not simply fondness. Loving an enemy means willing that person’s good, as one can love oneself while disapproving of one’s own actions. Forgiveness therefore does not require denying injury or abandoning justice. It does require resisting resentment and the pleasure of imagining an enemy as worse than the evidence shows.
### What a good answer covers
- Forgiveness seeks the person’s good, not approval of the act.
- Justice and punishment can remain compatible with forgiveness.
- Revenge, hatred, and delight in an enemy’s suffering are the attitudes Lewis rejects.
### Remember
Forgive the person without calling the wrongdoing good.
Related Questions
- In Lewis’s piano analogy, what corresponds to the Moral Law?(intermediate)
- Explain how Lewis responds to the objection that moral rules are merely social conventions.(intermediate)
- Reconstruct Lewis’s inference from the Moral Law to a power behind the universe, and identify one limit he places on that inference.(intermediate)
- In Lewis’s account, what makes free will valuable despite making evil possible?(intermediate)
- Lewis argues that the Moral Law is simply a description of what human beings usually do.(intermediate)
Want to practice more questions like this?
Join myBenkio free and practice past questions for your Nigerian university courses with AI explanations for every answer.
Start Practicing Free