A company learns that its hiring algorithm disadvantages women and minorities. Explain how Virtue Ethics should guide the company's response when fixing the issue would delay launch and cost money.

### What a good answer covers - Identify the disadvantage to women and minorities as a fairness problem. - Explain that justice and integrity support correcting the model rather than knowingly proceeding with unfair screening. - Explain that courage may be needed to accept delay and cost, while empathy keeps affected applicants in view. - Explain that prudence supports careful assessment instead of rushing a known risk. - State that launch speed and profit do not determine what a virtuous company should do. ### The concept Virtue Ethics evaluates the character shown in decisions. In this case, the company knows the hiring model produces a disadvantage for some groups, so ignoring the issue would reveal something about its priorities. A responsible response treats fairness as a real obligation, not a cosmetic improvement to postpone when inconvenient. The framework does not provide a mechanical checklist, but it guides judgment through character traits that matter to the decision. ### Remember When a known bias conflicts with schedule or cost, ask what fairness and responsibility require.