Skip to content

Why can the rights conflict in a digital healthcare platform not be resolved simply by saying that either access or privacy always wins?

Answer

Access to digital healthcare is a positive-right claim, while privacy is a negative-right claim. The platform may need some information to provide care, but that does not justify collecting or using all possible information. A defensible design seeks to protect both through necessary collection, clear purposes, appropriate consent, restricted access, security, retention limits, and patient access or correction processes.

Explanation

### What a good answer covers - Define access to healthcare as a positive right and privacy as a negative right. - Explain how healthcare delivery can require some data while collection can interfere with privacy. - Reject an automatic rule that one right always defeats the other. - Describe safeguards that let the system pursue access while limiting privacy impacts. ### The concept Rights can create competing demands without making either claim irrelevant. A platform that refuses all data collection may not deliver its intended healthcare service, but collecting excessive information or using it for unrelated purposes can undermine privacy. Careful design identifies what is necessary and controls use, access, security, and retention. This is a practical way to reduce conflict while respecting both kinds of right. ### Remember A rights conflict calls for a design that limits the trade-off, not an automatic winner.

Related Questions

Want to practice more questions like this?

Join myBenkio free and practice past questions for your Nigerian university courses with AI explanations for every answer.

Start Practicing Free