Skip to content

Explain why the claim “Two students used a new study app and earned high grades, so every user will earn a high grade” is a hasty generalization.

Answer

The conclusion applies to every user, but the evidence consists of only two students. Such a small sample may not represent all users, and the example gives no basis for assuming that all users will have the same outcome. The conclusion therefore goes beyond the evidence. This is a hasty generalization, a weak inductive inference. The claim could happen to be true or false, but the premises do not adequately support it.

Explanation

### What a good answer covers - Identify the two students as a very small sample. - Note that the sample may not represent all app users. - Compare the broad “every user” conclusion with the limited evidence. - Explain that the reasoning is weak regardless of whether the conclusion happens to be true. ### The concept A **hasty generalization** is an inductive fallacy: a broad claim about a group is drawn from too few or unrepresentative examples. Inductive arguments do not guarantee their conclusions, but their evidence must still make those conclusions reasonably probable. Two successful users do not establish the likely outcome for all users. This is a problem of evidential support, not proof that the app never helps anyone or that the conclusion is definitely false. ### Terms - **Inductive argument**: Reasoning that makes a conclusion probable rather than certain. - **Fallacy**: Faulty reasoning. - **Hasty generalization**: A general claim based on an inadequate sample. - **Sample**: The individuals or cases used as evidence about a larger group. ### Remember The broader the conclusion, the more representative evidence it needs.

Related Questions

Want to practice more questions like this?

Join myBenkio free and practice past questions for your Nigerian university courses with AI explanations for every answer.

Start Practicing Free